Crawdad Text Analysis Software
Many text mining software packages are marketed for security applications, especially monitoring and analysis of online plain text sources such as Internet news, blogs, etc. For national security purposes. Some of the software used for content analysis include Concordance, Crawdad Technologies LLC, Diction, General Inquirer, Hamlet II, INTEXT, Leximancer, Minnesota Contextual Content Analysis (MCCA), Profiler Plus, PROTAN, SALT Software, PASW Text Analytics for Surveys, T-LAB Tools for Text Analysis, TABARI, TACT (Text Analysis.
Scholars have been increasingly concerned with portrayals of terrorism in mainstream and alternative media outlets following the September 11 and subsequent terrorist attacks in the United Kingdom and Spain. Communication researchers have examined public response and reaction to terrorist attacks, definitions of terrorism, policy questions, media portrayals of terrorism, and framing across different media and nations. This study undertakes a comparative framing analysis of media coverage of terrorism, as reported by prominent U.S. and U.K. newspapers, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings revealed that the U.S. papers engaged in more episodic coverage and the U.K. papers in more thematic coverage of terrorism and terrorism-related events. The U.S. papers were consumed with presenting news associated with the military approach, whereas the U.K. papers were oriented toward diplomatic evaluations of terrorist events.
Text Mining software helps companies monitor social media sentiment and conduct market research using powerful data analysis tools. Related Categories Big Data Software. To this end the DHC provides software and consultation support for the closer analysis of text and image. Programs available on the department's machines or online resources recommended for use include WordSmith, Crawdad, NVIVO, and TAPor. Through implementing Crawdad Text Analysis System© software, the percentage of identical language contained in each corresponding set of documents is reported in the form of a resonance score. Invitation amicus briefs, which are extremely rare and have not been present much within past literature, were also examined in the same manner.
Best Text Analysis Software
Keywords terrorism, news, framing, U.S. newspapers, U.K. newspapers
| Baukus, R.A. , and S.M. Strohm. 2002. “Gender Differences in Perceptions of Media Reports of the gulf and Afghan Conflicts.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B. S. Greenberg , 275—87. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Blondheim, M. , and T. Liebes. 2003. “From Disaster Marathon to Media Event: Live Television's Performance on September 11, 2001, and September 11, 2002.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 185—97. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar |
| Cappella, J. , and K.H. Jamieson. 1996. “News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:71—85. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| Cappella, J. , and K.H. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism:The Press and the Public Good. NewYork: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar |
| Cohen, E.L. , S.J. Ball-Rokeach , J.-Y. Jung , and Y.-C. Kim. 2003. “Civic Actions after September 11: A Communication Infrastructure Perspective.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 31—43. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar |
| Cohen-Almagor, R. 2005. “Media coverage of acts of terrorism: Troubling Episodes and Suggested Guidelines.” Canadian Journal of Communication 30:383—409. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| Cooke, T. 2003. “Paramilitaries and the Press in Northern Ireland.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 75—92. New York: Routledge . Google Scholar |
| Corman, S. , and K. Dooley. 2006. Crawdad Text Analysis System 1.2. Chandler, AZ: Crawdad Technologies, LLC . Google Scholar |
| Corman, S. , T. Kuhn , R. McPhee , and K. Dooley. 2002. “Studying Complex Discursive Systems: Centering Resonance Analysis of Communication.” Human Communication Research 28(2):157—206. Google Scholar | ISI |
| Debatin, B. 2002. “`Plane Wreck with Spectators': Terrorism and Media Attention.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 163—74. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Dooley, K.J. , and S.R. Corman. 2002. “The Dynamics of Electronic Media Coverage.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 121—35. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Dooley, K.J. , and S.R. Corman. 2004. “Dynamic Analysis of News Streams: Institutional Versus Environmental Effects.” Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 8(3):403—28. Google Scholar | Medline |
| Entman, R.M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm .” Journal of Communication 43:51—68. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| Fairclough, N. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar |
| Fairclough, N. 2000. “Critical Analysis of Media Discourse.” In Media Studies: A Reader, 2nd Edition, ed. P. Marris and S. Thornham. New York: NYU Press . Google Scholar |
| Fairhurst, G.T. , and R.A. Sarr. 1996. The Art of Framing: Managing the Language of Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Google Scholar |
| Gitlin,T. 1980. The Whole World is Watching. Berkeley : University of California Press. Google Scholar |
| Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience . New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar |
| Greenberg, B.S. , ed. 2002. Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Greenberg, B.S. , L. Hofschire , and K. Lachlan. 2002. “Diffusion, Media Use and Interpersonal Communication Behaviors.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 3—16. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Haes, J.W.H. 2003. “September 11 in Germany and the United States: Reporting, Reception, and Interpretation.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 125—32. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar |
| Hart, W.B.I. , and F. Hassencahl. 2002. “Dehumanizing the Enemy in Editorial Cartoons.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 137—51. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Hoffner, C. , Y. Fujioka , A. Ibrahim , and J. Ye. 2002. “Emotion and Coping with Terror.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 229—44. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Iyengar, S. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Illinois: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| Jackson, G. 1990. “Terrorism and the News Media.” Terrorism & Political Violence 2(4):521—28. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| Jasperson, A.E. , and M.O. El-Kikhia. 2003. “CNN and al Jazeera's Media Coverage of America's War in Afghanistan.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 113—32. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar |
| Katz, J.E. , and R.E. Rice. 2003. “The Telephone as Medium of Faith, Hope, Terror, and Redemption: America, September 11.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 83—97. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar |
| Kim, Y.-C. , S.J. Ball-Rokeach , E.L. Cohen , and J.-Y. Jung. 2002. “Communication Infrastructure and Civic Actions in Crisis.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 289—303. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Liebes, T. , and A. First. 2003. “Framing the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 59—74. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar |
| McCombs, M. and Ghanem, S. 2001. “The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing .” In Framing Public Life , ed. S. Reese, A. Grant, and O. Gandy. Mahwah, NJ : LEA. Google Scholar |
| Mogensen, K. , L. Lindsay , X. Li , J. Perkins , and M. Beardsley. 2002. “How TV News Covered the Crisis: The Content of CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC and Fox.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 101—19. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Nacos, B.L. 2002. Mass-mediated Terrorism: The Central Role of the Media in Terrorism and Counterterrorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar |
| Nacos, B.L. , and O.Torres-Reyna. 2003. “Framing Muslim-Americans Before and After 9/11.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 93—112. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar |
| Noelle-Neumann, E. 2002. “Public Opinion Responses in Germany.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11 , ed. B.S. Greenberg , 205—16. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Noll, A.M. , ed. 2003. Crisis Communications: Lessonsfrom September 11. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar |
| Norris, P. , M. Kern , and M. Just. 2003. “FramingTerrorism.” In Framing Terrorism:The News Media, the Government, and the Public , ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 3—26. NewYork: Routledge. Google Scholar |
| Patterson, T. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf. Google Scholar |
| Patterson, T. 1996. “Bad News, Bad Governance.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:97—108. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| Perse, E. , N. Signorielli , J. Courtright , W. Samter , S. Caplan , and J. Lambe. 2002. “Public Perceptions of Media Functions at the Beginning of the War on Terrorism.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 39—52. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Picard, R.G. 1993. Media Portrayals of Terrorism: Functions and Meaning of News Coverage. Ames: Iowa State University Press. Google Scholar |
| Reese, S. 2001. “Framing Public Life.” In Framing Public Life , ed. S. Reese, A. Grant, and O. Gandy. Mahwah, NJ: LEA. Google Scholar |
| Rogers, E.M. 2003. “Diffusion of News of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks.” In Crisis Communications: Lessons from September 11, ed. A.M. Noll , 17—30. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar |
| Ruggiero, T. , and J. Glascock , J. 2002. “Tracking Media Use and Gratifications.” In Communication andTerrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 65—74. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Rusciano, F.L. 2003. Framing World Opinion in the Elite Press. In Framing Terrorism:The News Media, the Government, and the Public , ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 159—82. NewYork: Routledge. Google Scholar |
| Schaefer, T. 2003. “Framing the U.S. Embassy Bombings and September 11 Attacks in African and U.S. Newspapers.” In Framing Terrorism:The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. P. Norris , M. Kern , and M. Just , 93—112. NewYork : Routledge. Google Scholar |
| Semetko, H. , J.G. Blumler , M. Gurevitch , and D.H. Weaver. 1991. The Formation of Campaign Agendas. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar |
| Seeger, M.W. , S. Vennette , R.R. Ulmer , and T.L. Sellnow. 2002. “Media Use, Information Seeking, and Reported Needs in Post Crisis Contexts.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 53—63. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Stempel, G.H., III , and T. Hargrove. 2002. “Media Sources of Information and Attitudes about Terrorism.” In Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11, ed. B.S. Greenberg , 17—26. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar |
| Stohl, M. 1988. Demystifying Terrorism: The Myths and Realities of Contemporary Political Terrorism. In The Politics of Terrorism , ed. M. Stohl , 1—28. NewYork: Marcel Dekker. Google Scholar |
| Tankard, J. , L. Henderson , J. Silberman , K. Bliss , and S. Ghanem. 1991. “Media Frames: Approaches to Conceptualization and Measurement.”Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, 1991. Google Scholar |
| van Dijk, T.A. 1997. “Discourse as Interaction in Society.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. T.A. van Dijk. London: Sage. Google Scholar |
| Venkatraman, S. 2004. Media in a Terrorized World: Reflection in the Wake of 9/11. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press. Google Scholar |
| Weimann, G. 1985. Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Labeling Terrorism in the Israeli Press. Political Communication & Persuasion 2:433—45. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| Wood, L.A. & Kroger, R.O. 2000. Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar |
Document Analysis Software
- Since CRA networks typically contain hundreds of word connections, the CRA visualization that is constructed by Crawdad Analysis Software provides a visualization of a sub-network based on the most influential words in the document.
- Crawdad text analysis software was used to perform a Centering Resonance Analysis (CRA) on the documents (Corman et al. The CRA generates a network or matrix of the most influential terms (more specifically, noun phrases) in the.